Category: Uncategorized

  • Three Better Ways to Select a Contractor – Design/Build

    Three Better Ways to Select a Contractor – Design/Build

    In our previous blog, we gave a brief introduction to what Blueline believes are three better ways to select a contractor. In this post, we look more closely at Design/Build.

    This method has gained prominence over the past 40 years to the point where over 40% of all non-residential building project are done design-build. In this method, the owner hires the contractor first and makes them responsible for both the design and construction. Some contractors have architects and engineers on staff, others hire an architect just as they would hire another sub-contractor.

    Three Better Ways to Select a Contractor – Design/Build

    Pros:

    • One point of accountability for a successful outcome.
    • Fully take advantage of contractor’s knowledge of most economical materials and systems.
    • Contractor often has relationships with major sub-contractors who can also provide design expertise.
    • Eliminates redundant project management between contractors, architects and engineers reducing amount of project costs that go to design fees.
    • Can work around disruptions in the supply chain, increasing likelihood that the building is done on time.
    • Can better facilitate fast-tracking of projects.

    Cons:

    • Range of solutions often limited to materials, systems with which the contractor has the most experience with and sub-contractors with whom they have the best relationship.
    • Typically, the project is not “open-book.” Owner does not know how project cost is determined or have any say in which sub-contractors are used on the project.
    • Focus is on building first-cost (the initial cost of construction). Most contractors do not have the tools to help the owner evaluate long term cost of ownership.
    • Architects and engineers typically have limited involvement in the construction phase to monitor quality of workmanship and help avoid problems.
    • This method works best when there is a single person making decisions for the owner. Projects led by committees often require more options, input, and decision-making time, all of which can offset the efficiencies of design/build.

    Blueline has been part of numerous design/build teams.  If a contractor has a track record for successful project delivery and exceptional customer service, we don’t mind working for them. The best design/build teams include the architect in the early design process and provide them with an opportunity to interact with the client and hear their needs and expectations directly. Finally, a contractor who has demonstrated expertise with your type of project will better tailor the design/build process to your needs.

    Please contact us if you would like to discuss what type of contractor selection is right for your project.

  • Three Better Ways to Select a Contractor

    Three Better Ways to Select a Contractor

    How and when you select a contractor is a critical part of minimizing the risk of a construction project.  Ever-increasing costs and regulations combined with technology and building systems’ complexity make selecting the right contractor critical. The right contractor, teamed with the right architect, is essential to ensure you get the building you want, on-time, and on-budget.

    Traditionally, an owner would hire an architect who would oversee the entire design process resulting in a set of contract documents. The owner would invest months working with the architect, investing tens of thousands of dollars in fees. The contract documents would then be given to three or more contractors who would study the documents and submit a bid. Typically, the contractor with the lowest bid wins.

    We’ll leave it to the reader to Google why the “design-bid-build” system of contractor selection often results in projects that cost too much and aren’t completed on time.

    Three Better Ways to Select a Contractor

    At Blueline, we are advocates of selecting the contractor as early in the project as possible. Here are three better ways to select a contractor:

    1. Design/Build – This method has gained prominence over the past 40 years to the point where over 40% of all non-residential building projects are done design-build. The owner hires the contractor first and makes them responsible for both the design and construction. Some contractors have architects and engineers on staff, and others hire an architect just as they would hire another sub-contractor.

    Blueline has been part of numerous design/build teams. If a contractor has a track record for successful project delivery and exceptional customer service, we don’t mind working for them.  The best design/build teams include the architect in the early design process and provide them with an opportunity to interact with the client and hear their needs and expectations directly. A contractor who has demonstrated expertise with your type of project will better tailor the design/build process to your needs.

    2. Construction Management at Risk – This method essentially hires both the architect and contractor at the start of the project. Sometimes the contractor is selected first and helps the owner interview and select an architect; sometimes, it’s the other way around. In either case, the architect and owner have separate contracts with the owner.

    This method’s key feature is that throughout the design process, the contractor is responsible for producing budgets and schedules based on the architect’s design work. The contractor can also advise on the availability of material and the constructability of the proposed scheme. The architect then adapts the design so that the design, budget, and schedule align with the owner’s expectations.

    3. Negotiated Selection — In this scenario, the owner hires the architect to develop a conceptual design. The architect develops a building program that meets the owner’s functional needs then develops plans and 3D views that illustrate design intent. The final conceptual design package should include an outline specification of materials and systems. 

    The conceptual design package is then given to three to five contractors who are asked to provide a non-binding budget and stipulate a proposed fee. Interviews are then conducted where the contractor is typically asked to suggest ways to save money, manage the project, minimize changes, etc. The contractor best aligned with the owner’s goals and expectations is selected to advise on cost, schedule, and constructability throughout the remainder of the design process.

    Like the Construction Manager at Risk method, the architect and contractor have separate agreements with the owner.

    We’ll elaborate on each of the methods more in subsequent blogs. We’ll provide pros and cons and keys to success based on our extensive experience with each method.

    There is no one best way. The right way to select a contractor depends on the type of project, how well the owner knows what they need to build, and their expectations for quality, price, and schedule.

    In the meantime, if you are looking to hire a contractor and want to discuss your unique situation, contact us through our website.

  • Clarity Not Certainty

    Clarity Not Certainty

    During a recent phone call, my good friend Pat Kase, Senior Project Developer with Aspen Group, said, “What our clients are looking for is clarity, not certainty.” Pat’s gift for insight is matched only by his deft alliteration. His words did echo what Blueline is hearing from clients as they discern whether to undertake building projects.

    The pandemic has brought clarity.  It has forced churches, schools, and businesses to focus on what is of value to their constituents and to discard everything that is not. COVID has been called “The Great Accelerator” – bringing rapid growth to that which is good and the need for swift cancellation to that which is not. Organizations that recognized the difference and responded quickly continue to thrive. For a donor-funded organization such as churches and private schools, this has been particularly true.

    Clarity Not Certainty

    But the past 12 months have also tested our assumptions about the future. For those of us who love a good 5-year plan and get a racing pulse while “visioning,” the pandemic has brought humility and uncertainty. At best, strategic plans need significant recalibration. At worst, your strategic plan is in the trash can, and you are staring at a blank piece of paper.

    So, if your church, school, or business does indeed have clarity, here are several things to keep in mind as you align your facilities with your mission and purpose:

    1. Keep your options open. Even if you are building or renovating to address an immediate need, make sure you do not do something that limits future options. Master planning is good, but an hour planning session with Blueline can help you analyze traffic, utilities, pedestrian patterns, storm-water management, and topography enough to make sure you are not building yourself into a box. Choose clear-span building systems and minimize load-bearing walls. Stack and gang plumbing and use HVAC systems that do not require large duct runs. In many cases, common sense and experience can help you make near-term improvements without limiting growth.
    2. Move quickly. Chris Weaver, President and CEO of Lantz Construction Company, says that the market for materials and labor “feels like the wild west.” Over the past decade, construction costs have risen by 50%. Inflation is hovering around 4% and is likely to go up a point the next year. Interest rates are still relatively low, but we have not met a business leader who expects them to stay low. If you are undertaking a project to meet current needs, you logically want to address them as soon as possible. Blueline understands that when a client says, “Go!” we need to have a plan and move fast.
    3. More donations, less debt. With uncertainty about the future, most organizations have a relatively short planning horizon. Understandably, this means clients do not want to take on long-term debt. The good news is that many of our church and Christian School clients are seeing stable income. The care, hard work, and creativity they have put into serving their congregations and constituents mean there is a reservoir of goodwill. That goodwill can translate into strong giving for projects that are vital to the continued fulfillment of the organization’s mission and purpose. Blueline can generate the data and renderings your church or school needs to make its case for support

    Blueline remains ready to equip your facilities so that they amplify your mission. Whether your project is big or small, we will match your clarity with our experience and understanding.